Posted at March 20, 2014 | By: | Categories: Coffee Talk with Mouse and Tracy,Treatment and Intervention | 7 Comments

Understanding the Fragile X Learning Style for Better Results

Understanding the Fragile X Learning Style

“Siri, what does the fox say?” She answers with: “Ding ding ding da ding da ding ding”.

“Siri, what is fragile X syndrome?” She answers with: “I’m checking….here’s what I found.” She then provides links to the Wikipedia site definition of Fragile X, the NIH genetics home reference page on Fragile X and medicinenet page on fragile X syndrome (FXS).

imageSiri-ously – good information is readily available! The National Fragile X Foundation has PAGES and PAGES of credible, helpful information. We often remind fellow interventionists and educators time and time again about the many unique aspects of FXS as well as the resources available online and in print.

The specific phenotype of FXS results in a particular way of thinking, what we call the Fragile X learning style. It also phenotypically results in a presentation of anxiety and hyperarousal. These key aspects of FXS must always be in the forefront of our minds to guide any educational, therapeutic, behavioral, vocational or independent living plan. In fact, if you ask Siri about either of these, information is readily available with links to the Foundation website, consensus documents and research.

Our now global ability to access information lends hope that interventionists and educators as well as families and medical providers can be more informed. FXS and its nuances no longer need to be a mystery. Just ask Siri!

Below are two recent and not uncommon scenarios that recently came to us by email. These examples highlight that accessing FXS specific information is essential to good programming. Families raising a child or an adult with Fragile X are encouraged to understand and advocate for programming that includes an understanding of the key aspects of FXS.

An FBA (Functional Behavioral Assessment) is provided for a student with FXS who presents inappropriate behavior (you name the BEHAVIOR – avoidance, aggressions, silliness to gain attention, escaping, no engagement with non-preferred activities, etc. ). Fancy charts of data may accompany the FBA, linking the behavior to the motivation. The function of the behavior is identified (one of seven common functions, though none of them are FX specific) and a plan is put in place to support and reinforce the desired outcome. However, even a well-trained behaviorist may miss the common FXS specific reasons (or antecedents) for the behavior, rendering the assessment just off track enough to not effectively guide intervention. For instance, we recently reviewed a behavior plan that was not working well for an elementary aged boy with FXS. The intervention included the use of a token economy and reinforcers for desired compliant behavior to be faded out when his inappropriate behavior was reduced by 80%.

In the above example, there was no mention of the child’s learning strengths, interests or how his learning style would be addressed. We know that when a child’s learning style is not met, slower learning and an increase in maladaptation will likely result.

Additionally, there was no mention of the effect of the Fragile X biology of hyperarousal (a common behavioral antecedent) and no proactive plan included to manage the antecedent. It is not a mystery, then, that the plan was ineffective.

Unless the true reason for the behavior is identified and managed by a comprehensive, positive behavioral support plan, the plan will not work. In the scenario just described, the assessment and resultant intervention plan would have hit the mark if it simply had included the basic information on hyperarousal and basic learning style common to FXS.

Let’s consider another common theme highlighted in this recent email.

After two years in the same classroom, a seven year old is starting to be placed part time in the regular education classroom, as part of a transition for next year’s halftime resource room, halftime special education. His special education teacher has stopped using any visual supports because the child is “doing so well.” The child is now showing avoidant and disruptive behaviors all day long, previously unusual for him, and the teacher is asking what to do.

We frequently hear that a teacher used to use visual supports, but faded them out because a child was doing so well. This leads to the “things are falling apart” 911 call to Mouse and Tracy four or five months later. Living with Fragile X means learning to live with ongoing strategies and supports. It is akin to an insulin dependent diabetic – no one would question the need for wellness and medical supports in such a person and the goal would not be to suddenly stop taking insulin because the person is doing so well.

Cindi Roger’s video is a great example of the use of visual aids for the Fragile X learning style.

We know that individuals with FXS are visual learners. This will not change – even when they have excellent comprehension of verbal information and understand the routines of the day. The visual approach is important for specific learning, but more than this, visual supports are important as they “hold” information for the person in an external place, freeing up thinking space and reducing anxiety. Visuals function as an ongoing means of keeping hyperarousal in check, as well. Visuals may be used to help with transitions during the school day. The visuals allow for a consistent and reliable safety support so that when a more challenging transition is impending, the child can rely on the visual to help them in that situation.

Visuals offer a ready means of keeping directions and demands a bit more indirect. As indirect interaction helps to limit social anxiety, a visual acts as an intermediary between the person of authority and the individual and therein is an important tool.

Fading a support is just not an option. The nature of the support may change – a visual picture schedule at age eight may turn into an iPhone calendar app at age 23. Learning to use, even embrace, visual supports is the goal, not fading them out due to progress.

So, whether observing for an FBA, or transitioning a child into a new class, we must always remember to take into account how the specific phenotype of FXS affects our programming. The National Fragile X Foundation has an abundance of material available for free to help us make informed decisions about how to support our children and adults with FXS, and this information is readily available, just ask Siri!

Authors

Sarah 'Mouse' Scharfenaker, MA, CCC-SLPSarah “Mouse” Scharfenaker, MA, CCC-SLP
fondly known as “Mouse”, is vice-president, CFO and co-founder of Developmental FX. She has worked in the fields of fragile X syndrome and neurodevelopmental disorders for more than 25 years. She received both her undergraduate and graduate degrees from the University of Montana, Missoula.
Tracy Stackhouse, MA, OTRTracy Stackhouse, MA, OTR
a Colorado native, is president and co-founder of Developmental FX. She is a leading pediatric occupational therapist (OT) involved in clinical treatment, research, mentoring, and training regarding OT intervention for persons with neurodevelopmental disorders, especially fragile X syndrome and autism.


Developmental FX

In following articles for the NFXF, we will elaborate on more of the specific characteristics of FXS, highlighting strengths and how to utilize them best for home, school and work planning.